Google alone Googlebot is each page on your site, if and when a known link to Google added. When the Googlebot spidered page, which sometimes gives so much time to see your updates. Shortly after his visit to Google’s index updates and changes in the ranking of your pages. If the content (visible text, picture, description, …) on a page, Google will present their pages to your new keywords, or SERP ranking of your pages in another way. If you’ve added new sites, and if left in these pages, Google is included in the index. It is quite simple, but in order to use Google’s map service is not necessary to understand the details. Hire an SEO, if you want your site better.

This procedure has its drawbacks, both webmasters and Google, too. Subscribing to the resources and a high percentage of the results are more or less useless. Google crawl with numerous number of pages per day, only to discover that no change. Since Google’s robots are busy, taken to the archive pages to the stone age of the Internet in search of new forms of content, is too late. What we lack is a channel of communication between Google and website owners, for the process of observation. To cope with the billions of pages on the Internet, Google does not have the ability to communicate with webmasters on an individual basis or by location. Google Sitemaps cannelloni, which is open to all, a method for exchanging information on new and updated content on time. Both sides can benefit: Google saves a lot of time machine, and bandwidth costs, and site owners to get their new content to Google before the SERP, and the server load Googlebot no longer * Spidering archived content too often.

In view of the beast, this channel fully automate the needs of both sides. Google itself as the operator of this service, but several million webmasters around the world calling for the implementation of an appropriate solution to fully automate the Google Sitemaps generation and maintenance, in addition to the bicycle. Google Sitemap Generator is to require Python 2.2 or higher from the Internet. Webmasters couple announced their scripts at boards, blogs, some of the solutions proposed written in PHP, ASP and other programming languages, and the handful of tools are available through the Google Sitemaps team reports. Sooner or then all of the content management systems come with this feature built.

Fortunately, there are many good things there. Unfortunately, the relatively rapid growth in the number of articles and pieces of code compiled with message boards, blogs, Usenet groups and search sites, the webmaster to find a solution for flexible assembly and in particular the needs, try a needle in haystack. The provision for the Webmaster to have code monkey can be applied over the script, we offer not only an unnecessary piece of code but the manual on how to use the site map

What Is a Title Tag?

The title tag has been — and probably will always be — one of the most important factors in achieving high search engine rankings.

In fact, fixing just the title tags of your pages can often generate quick and appreciable differences to your rankings. And because the words in the title tag are what appear in the clickable link on the search engine results page (SERP), changing them may result in more clickthroughs.

Search Engines and Title Tags

Title tags are definitely one of the “big three” as far as the algorithmic weight given to them by search engines they are equally as important as your visible text copy and the links pointing to your pages — perhaps even more so.

Do Company Names Belong in the Title Tag?

This is one of the most common questions asked about titles. The answer is a resounding YES! I’ve found that it’s fine to place your company name in the title, and *gasp*, even to place it at the beginning of the tag! In fact, if your company is already a well-known brand, I’d say that it’s essential. Even if you’re not a well-known brand yet, chances are you’d like to eventually be one. The title tag gives you a great opportunity to further this cause.

Read more »

7 Reasons Why Google Chrome, the New Google Browser is a Bad Idea

Do you remember the browser wars? No, not Star Wars, the browser wars. In the prehistoric era of the Web we had Netscape Navigators which guided us through the World Wide Wait. Netscape 2, 3 and 4 were the dominant browsers back then. Then Microsoft made the situation more difficult by gaining market share.

Believe it or not but at a certain point the Internet Explorer was the best browser to use, Netscape failed to fulfill both Internet users’ and web developers’ needs.

Thus Netscape 6 (there never was a 5) was built from scratch. Firefox is what came out of it in the end, so it was a happy ending, unless it was no ending at all! Now Google wants to go to war again with a proprietary browser!

Google Chrome is a bad idea for many reasons, at least 7:

1. Proprietary: If you think the Microsoft monopoly sucks don’t you think that a Google monopoly does suck as well? It might be partly open source, but Google Chrome won’t be another Firefox, you can bet. Google is the Microsoft of the Web. It won’t be friendly forever. Just ask the Chinese.
2. Privacy: Google knows what you search (Google search), what you read (iGoogle, Google Reader), what people visit a site (Google Analytics), what sites you visit (Google toolbar, lifetime Google cookies, DoubleClick tracking cookies) etc. but there still are some unknowns, from time to time. With a Google browser you can’t hide anything anymore.
3. Ads: Both Firefox and Internet Explorer 8 come with either built in or easily added Google ad blockers. A Google browser is basically a Google Ads feeding machine.
4. Web Development: Web Developers have a difficult enough job to fix websites for the 4 most used existing browsers now IE7, IE6, Firefox, Opera. Do you think a Google browser and IE8 will make it easier? Currently building websites often takes up less time already than tweaking them for different browsers.
5. Web Standards: Do you really expect Google and Microsoft to implement the same Web Standards? No way, they will attempt to push their own ways of interpreting them, both will differ. We’ll end up with web apps or even websites working just on one of them.
6. Firefox: The guy who built Firefox now works with Google or for both FF and Google. Do you really think this will go forever and Google will support it’s own free and non-profit open source competition?
7. Search: No other search engine will be able to succeed in future. Google will just like Microsoft bundle the browser with the search engine so that any new search engine that comes up in future will face an unsurmountable disadvantage: It won’t be able to gain market share without owning a browser.

Read more »